Is modern architecture as valuable as historic architecture?

liu1_5   VS   Pantheon

When I created this blog and the architectureGROUPIE website I asked many people for their feedback, both architects and non-architects, requesting feedback such as if the information was useful, if they would use it, and so forth.  I was definitely more interested in what the non-architects had to say and a recurring comment was “I don’t really visit architecture when I travel”.   I was stumped, since I am an architect and quiet honestly surrounded by them almost all the time I understand we are rare breed so I really didn’t have a clue what people do when they travel other than visit architecture!

So I continued to probe…

What I eventually discovered is that they in fact do visit architecture but typically think of it as landmarks or monuments and they were almost always old, historic and on a travel map.

SO why does the general public consider historic architecture worth visiting and new architect not  worth visiting???

drawing some of my own conclusions I posed this question to all of you:

Is modern architecture as valuable as historic architecture?

here are some possible explanations from all your thoughts:

  • historic architecture which still remains has stood the test of time
  • new architecture is about experimenting and inspired by many things – people just don’t understand architecture now perhaps because there used to be rules and principals to follow
  • some love historic architecture due to some deep nostalgia
  • architecture is making strides in technological improvements but forgetting about the experience
  • architects are involved with the edifice and not the experience
  • architecture is a representation of current ideals – time allows for an appreciation of the those ideals to develop and modern architecture has not had enough time
  • building’s are given significance when it is put in a book or placed on a map
  • historic architecture is known by a greater number of people – they are popular and some are a part of pop culture
  • the wonder of historic architecture’s creation makes it special, new architecture uses technology and machines which we appreciate differently
  • building materials have changed, a large stone building demands more attention
  • the machine age and technology has created a longing for craftsmanship
  • some need to be engaged with architecture to find it valuable – perhaps modern architecture lacks engagement with the public
  • there is a lack of education regarding design among the majority
  • some don’t care for concrete, glass and steel, minimalist design but architects continue to this
  • modern architecture doesn’t have the history and the history is what creates interest and value

my quest for answers continues…

do you have something to add? contribute to this conversation here or on facebook / twitter

Advertisements

8 comments

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s